Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16783576›Full record

Trial reportCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2007

Analysis of naïve and memory CD4 and CD8 T cell populations in breast cancer patients receiving a HER2/neu peptide (E75) and GM-CSF vaccine.

Matthew T Hueman, Alexander Stojadinovic, Catherine E Storrer, Zia A Dehqanzada, Jennifer M Gurney, Craig D Shriver, Sathibalan Ponniah, George E Peoples

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00841399 phase1completednot on this map

Phase Ib Trial of HER2/Neu Peptide (E75) Vaccine in Breast Cancer Patients at Risk for Recurrence After Surgical and Medical Therapies

TypeinterventionalSponsorCOL George Peoples, MD, FACSRan2001 to 2013Enrolled100ConditionsBreast CancerArmsE75 + GM-CSF vaccine
NCT00854789 phase1completednot on this map

Phase Ib Trial of HER2/Neu Peptide (E75) Vaccine in Node Negative Breast Cancer Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorCOL George Peoples, MD, FACSRan2002 to 2013Enrolled95ConditionsBreast CancerArmsE75 + GM-CSF vaccine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Memory CD4Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The E75 HER2/neu peptide vaccine.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew T HuemanClinical Breast Care Project, Department of Surgery, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307, USA.
Alexander Stojadinovic
Catherine E Storrer
Zia A Dehqanzada
Jennifer M Gurney
Craig D Shriver
Sathibalan Ponniah
George E Peoples
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research · USHenry M. Jackson Foundation · USWalter Reed National Military Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We are conducting clinical trials of the E75 peptide as a vaccine in breast cancer (BrCa) patients. We assessed T cell subpopulations in BrCa patients before and after E75 vaccination and compared them to healthy controls. We obtained 17 samples of blood from ten healthy individuals and samples from 22 BrCa patients prior to vaccination. We also obtained pre- and post-vaccination samples of blood from seven BrCa patients who received the E75/GM-CSF vaccine. CD4, CD8, CD45RA, CD45RO, and CCR7 antibodies were used to analyze the CD4+ and CD8+ T cells by four-color flow cytometry. Compared to healthy individuals, BrCa patients have significantly more memory and less naïve T cells and more effector-memory CD8+ and less effector CD4+ T cells. Phenotypic differences in defined circulating CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subpopulations suggest remnants of an active immune response to tumor distinguished by a predominant memory T cell response and by untapped recruitment of naïve helper and cytotoxic T cells. E75 vaccination induced recruitment of both CD4+ and CD8+ naïve T cells while memory response remained stable. Additionally, vaccination induced global activation of all T cells, with specific enhancement of effector CD4+ T cells. E75 vaccination causes activation of both memory and naïve CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, while recruiting additional naïve CD4+ and CD8+ T cells to the overall immune response.

Indexed as

Antigens, CDBreast NeoplasmsCancer VaccinesCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesFemaleFlow CytometryFluorescent Antibody TechniqueGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansImmunologic MemoryImmunophenotypingLymphocyte ActivationPeptide FragmentsAntigens, CDCancer VaccinesGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHER-2 peptide E75 (369-377), humanPeptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID16783576
PMCPMC11030802
OpenAlexW2163718404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.