Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16783009›Full record

ArticleGenetics2006

Heritable endosymbionts of Drosophila.

Mariana Mateos, Sergio J Castrezana, Becky J Nankivell, Anne M Estes, Therese A Markow, Nancy A Moran

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 222 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Infection and immunity · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. The endosymbiontmBio · 2024
    Article
  10. The role of animal hosts in shaping gut microbiome variation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Unraveling the Role of Antimicrobial Peptides in Insects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The toxins of vertically transmittedFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  16. Disproportionate investment in Spiralin B production limits in-host growth and favors the vertical transmission ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The wall-less bacteriumiScience · 2021
    Article
  20. Review

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mariana MateosDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA. mmateos@tamu.edu
Sergio J Castrezana
Becky J Nankivell
Anne M Estes
Therese A Markow
Nancy A Moran
University of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although heritable microorganisms are increasingly recognized as widespread in insects, no systematic screens for such symbionts have been conducted in Drosophila species (the primary insect genetic models for studies of evolution, development, and innate immunity). Previous efforts screened relatively few Drosophila lineages, mainly for Wolbachia. We conducted an extensive survey of potentially heritable endosymbionts from any bacterial lineage via PCR screens of mature ovaries in 181 recently collected fly strains representing 35 species from 11 species groups. Due to our fly sampling methods, however, we are likely to have missed fly strains infected with sex ratio-distorting endosymbionts. Only Wolbachia and Spiroplasma, both widespread in insects, were confirmed as symbionts. These findings indicate that in contrast to some other insect groups, other heritable symbionts are uncommon in Drosophila species, possibly reflecting a robust innate immune response that eliminates many bacteria. A more extensive survey targeted these two symbiont types through diagnostic PCR in 1225 strains representing 225 species from 32 species groups. Of these, 19 species were infected by Wolbachia while only 3 species had Spiroplasma. Several new strains of Wolbachia and Spiroplasma were discovered, including ones divergent from any reported to date. The phylogenetic distribution of Wolbachia and Spiroplasma in Drosophila is discussed.

Indexed as

Infectious Disease Transmission, VerticalAnimalsBacterial InfectionsDNA, BacterialDrosophilaFemaleGene FrequencyGenetic VariationMaleMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenySpiroplasmaSymbiosisWolbachiaDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID16783009
PMCPMC1569794
OpenAlexW2153308845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.