Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16781178›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2006

Evaluation of a commercial in-house test kit for the semi-quantitative assessment of microalbuminuria in cats.

Ellie J Mardell, Andrew H Sparkes

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Feline CKD: Diagnosis, staging and screening - what is recommended?Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2013
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Proteinuria in dogs and cats.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2012
    Review
  9. Article
  10. American association of feline practitioners. Senior care guidelines.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2009
    Article
  11. Proteinuria in cats. Prognostic marker or mediator?Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ellie J MardellNantwich Veterinary Group, Crewe Road End, Nantwich, Cheshire CW5 2SF, UK. ejmardell@ukonline.co.uk
Andrew H Sparkes
Animal Health Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteinuria was assessed in 100 randomly selected sick cats and 22 healthy cats by means of the urine protein:creatinine ratio, a traditional urine "dipstick" and a commercial ELISA-based dipstick designed to detect microalbuminuria (MA) semi-quantitatively. In addition the repeatability and reproducibility of the MA test was assessed by comparing results of five replicate tests of 26 urine samples, interpreted by two different readers. Discrepancies existed in the replicate test result in 23 and 27% of the samples examined by reader 1 and 2, respectively, and on several occasions this discrepancy was between whether the sample was "positive" or "negative" for MA. The inter-reader agreement was good (kappa=0.75), but again discrepancies were noted and part of the reason for these problems appeared to be the necessary subjectivity in the interpretation of colour changes when reading test results. Proteinuria was significantly (P< or =0.014) more prevalent in the sick than the healthy cats with 36 and 9%, respectively, having detectable MA, 34 and 5%, respectively, having a urine protein to creatinine (UPC) ratio >0.5, and 84 and 9%, respectively, having positive urine protein dipstick analysis. There was a moderate significant correlation between UPC ratio and MA concentrations (r(s)=0.68, P<0.0001). While 13/87 cats with a UPC ratio < or =0.5 had positive MA results, 10/84 cats with negative MA results had a UPC ratio >0.5, and none of these had evidence of lower urinary tract disease. This study confirmed that MA and proteinuria are commonly seen in cats with a variety of diseases, but they are not necessarily both elevated, and the UPC ratio can be elevated without an increase in MA results. Furthermore, some repeatability problems were demonstrated with the semi-quantitative MA test. These findings demonstrate that the semi-quantitative MA test should not be relied on as the sole determinant of proteinuria.

Indexed as

Reagent StripsAnimalsCat DiseasesCatsCreatininePredictive Value of TestsProteinuriaReference ValuesSensitivity and SpecificityUnited KingdomCreatinineReagent Strips

Identifiers

PMID16781178
PMCPMC10822536
OpenAlexW2097105063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.