Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1677944›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1991

Restriction fragment analysis of a Candida tropicalis outbreak of sternal wound infections.

B N Doebbeling, R J Hollis, H D Isenberg, R P Wenzel, M A Pfaller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Impact of the changing epidemiology of fungal infections in the 1990s.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 1992
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

B N DoebbelingDepartment of Medicine, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City.
R J Hollis
H D Isenberg
R P Wenzel
M A Pfaller

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An apparent single-source outbreak of Candida tropicalis sternal wound infections in eight patients was investigated by utilizing DNA restriction fragment analysis (RFA) with HindIII and BstNI. All eight outbreak isolates appeared to be identical and were easily differentiated from control isolates by DNA RFA. Compared with an arbitrarily selected reference outbreak isolate, greater than or equal to 95% of the bands in the restriction digests identified by a computerized image analysis system from each of the outbreak isolates were identical versus 13 to 53% of the bands in any of the nine control isolates. Outbreak strains were significantly more likely to match the reference outbreak isolate than were controls (P less than 0.0001). The RFA was greatly facilitated by the use of computerized image analysis and confirmed the epidemiologic link between a scrub nurse and the infected patients.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksCandidaCandidiasisHumansNursing Staff, HospitalPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthSternumSurgical Wound Infection

Identifiers

PMID1677944
PMCPMC271976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.