ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2005
Of mice and men: design of a comparative anatomy information system.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- An ontology-based comparative anatomy information system.Artificial intelligence in medicine · 2011Article
- Experience in Aligning Anatomical Ontologies.International journal on Semantic Web and information systems · 2007Article
- A graphical user interface for a comparative anatomy information system: design, implementation and usage scenarios.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2006Article
- Of mice and men: aligning mouse and human anatomies.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2005Article
- Alignment of multiple ontologies of anatomy: deriving indirect mappings from direct mappings to a reference.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In previous work, we proposed an approach called the Structural Difference Method (SDM) to correlating the anatomy of Homo sapiens with selected species, using the Foundational Model of Anatomy (FMA) as a framework and graph matching as a method, for determining similarities and differences between species. In this paper, we present the design of a comparative anatomy information system that utilizes the SDM and allows users to issue queries to determine the similarities and differences between two species. Our system will serve as a pilot project for cross-species anatomical information collection, storage, and retrieval. The underlying data structure of a mapping, and the syntax and semantics of the system's query language, are presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16779137PMC1560542W45387812What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.