Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16779095›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2005

Comparing natural language processing tools to extract medical problems from narrative text.

Stéphane M Meystre, Peter J Haug

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Aligning Structured and Unstructured Medical Problems Using UMLS.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2010
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Content and structure of clinical problem lists: a corpus analysis.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2008
    Article
  18. Named entity recognition of follow-up and time information in 20,000 radiology reports.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Natural Language Processing for EHR-Based Computational Phenotyping.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stéphane M MeystreDepartment of Medical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Peter J Haug

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To help maintain a complete, accurate and timely Problem List, we are developing a system to automatically retrieve medical problems from free-text documents. This system uses Natural Language Processing to analyze all electronic narrative text documents in a patient's record. Here we evaluate and compare 3 different applications of NLP technology in our system: the first using MMTx (MetaMap Transfer) with a negation detection algorithm (NegEx), the second using an alpha version of a locally developed NLP application called MPLUS2, and the third using keyword searching. They were adapted and trained to extract medical problems from a set of 80 problems of diagnosis type. The version using MMTx and NegEx was improved by adding some disambiguation and modifying the negation detection algorithm, and these modifications significantly improved recall and precision. The different versions of the NLP module were compared, and showed the following recall / precision results: standard MMTx with NegEx version 0.775 / 0.398; improved MMTx with NegEx version 0.892 / 0.753; MPLUS2 version 0.693 / 0.402; and keyword searching version 0.575 / 0.807. Average results for the reviewers were a recall of 0.788 and a precision of 0.912.

Indexed as

Medical Records, Problem-OrientedMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedNatural Language ProcessingAlgorithmsBayes TheoremHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalNeural Networks, ComputerUnified Medical Language System

Identifiers

PMID16779095
PMCPMC1560561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.