Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16779081›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2005

A high-level specification for adaptive ecological momentary assessment: real-time assessment of drug craving, use and abstinence.

Jia-Ling Lin, Massoud Vahabzadeh, Mustapha Mezghanni, David H Epstein, Kenzie L Preston

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01229163 (Automated Prize-Based Contigency Management to Increase Counseling Attendance in Opiate-Replacement-Therapy Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01229163 early_phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2010, after this paper: background citation

Automated Prize-Based Contigency Management to Increase Counseling Attendance in Opiate-Replacement-Therapy Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Ran2010 to 2012Enrolled25ConditionsOpiate-Replacement TherapyArmsAutomated Contingency Management (ACM) software
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jia-Ling LinDHHS/National Institutes Health, National Institutes on Drug Abuse, Intramural Research Program, USA.
Massoud Vahabzadeh
Mustapha Mezghanni
David H Epstein
Kenzie L Preston

Funding

Evaluation Of Treatments Of Opioid And Cocaine DependenceZIADA000175 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI PRESTON, KENZIE · 2009 to 2016
$7.4M
EVALUATION OF TREATMENTS OF OPIOID DEPENDENCE IN HIV PATIENTSZ01DA000175 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI PRESTON, KENZIE L · 1995 to 2008
$2.3M
PSYCHOLOGICAL/METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN SUBSTANCE ABUSEZ01DA000234 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI PRESTON, KENZIE L · 1993 to 2008
$1.4M
Psychological And Methodological Issues In Substance Abuse Treatment/researchZIADA000234 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI PRESTON, KENZIE · 2009 to 2010
$546k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In psychological research, efforts to capture day-to-day human experience traditionally relied on pen-and-paper diaries and questionnaires. Some current studies, however, incorporate handheld computers, which provide researchers with many options and advantages in addition to providing more reliable data. One advantage of using handheld computers is the programmability of the electronic diary, which, compared to old-fashioned paper diaries, affords the researchers with a wealth of possibilities. An important possibility is to construct a built-in mechanism in the computer-administered questionnaires that would allow transparent branching, in which question presentation is contingent on participants' answers to previous questions. The major hurdle in implementing such an approach is the limitations of the platform used for such assessments: inexpensive "low-end" handheld devices. We propose a high-level specification which enables non-programming researchers to "branch" their questionnaires without modifications to the source code in a highly user-friendly fashion, with backtracking capability and very modest hardware requirements. A finite state automaton approach was implemented, we believe for the first time, to create an auto-trigger mechanism for the real-time evaluation of the conditions. This solution provides our investigators with the capacity to administer efficient assessments that are dynamically customized to reflect participants' behaviors without the need for any post-production programming.

Indexed as

Computers, HandheldMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedSoftware DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesBehavioral ResearchComputer SystemsHumansMedical RecordsSoftwareSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID16779081
PMCPMC1560797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.