Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16779055›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2005

An evaluation of three policies for updating product categories in the National Retail Data Monitor.

William R Hogan, Garrick L Wallstrom, Michael M Wagner

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

William R HoganThe RODS Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Garrick L Wallstrom
Michael M Wagner
Arizona State University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Detectability of Epidemics from Over-the-Counter SalesR21LM008278 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WALLSTROM, GARRICK L · 2004 to 2006
$497k
NLM NIH HHS 1 R21 LM008278-01NLM NIH HHS R21 LM008278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A problem in biosurveillance is how frequently to update controlled vocabularies that identify various data elements such as laboratory tests and over-the-counter healthcare products. More frequent updates improve completeness of data captured over time, but introduction of new codes into a surveillance system may cause false alarms when codes are aggregated into analytic categories. We studied the effect of three policies for updating UPCs, the controlled vocabulary for over-the-counter healthcare products used by the National Retail Data Monitor. To compare different policies for updating, we analyzed historical data from two cities for the 18 product categories of the National Retail Data Monitor under annual, quarterly, or monthly UPC update policies. We measured the effect on data completeness and false alarm rate. We found that the monthly update policy had the highest data completeness and led to the fewest number of additional false alarms. Overall, monthly updating of UPCs was the superior policy.

Indexed as

Electronic Data ProcessingPopulation SurveillanceVocabulary, ControlledCommerceNonprescription DrugsRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsNonprescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID16779055
PMCPMC1560721
OpenAlexW2289193513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.