Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16779034›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2005

Assessing the potential economic value of health information technology interventions in a community-based health network.

Eric L Eisenstein, Kevin J Anstrom, Jennifer M Macri, David R Crosslin, Frederick S Johnson, Kensaku Kawamoto, David F Lobach

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00365885 (Showing Health Information Value in a Community Network), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00365885 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2006, after this paper: background citation

Showing Health Information Value in a Community Network

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke UniversityRan2006 to 2008Enrolled20,108ConditionsClinical Decision Support, Medical Informatics Interventions, Population Health Management, Quality of HealthcareArmsComputer-based clinical decision support.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eric L EisensteinDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Kevin J Anstrom
Jennifer M Macri
David R Crosslin
Frederick S Johnson
Kensaku Kawamoto
David F Lobach

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health information professionals recognize the need to demonstrate that the benefits of health information technological (HIT) interventions outweigh their costs. However, such cost-benefit analyses are rarely conducted for HIT interventions, due in part to the lack of a standard methodology. In this study, we describe how the U.S. Public Health Service's guidelines for health economic analyses can be used to evaluate HIT interventions. This framework is described in the context of an economic analysis we are conducting for three HIT interventions to be implemented in a community-based health network caring for Medicaid beneficiaries in Durham County, North Carolina. At present, the 17,779 patients in our study cost Medicaid more than $5 million per month. In sensitivity analyses, we demonstrate that if our information intervention redirects just 10% of low-severity emergency room encounters to outpatient encounters, it will result in $12,523 of monthly savings to the local health system.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsBiomedical TechnologyCommunity NetworksCost-Benefit AnalysisCost SavingsEmergency Service, HospitalHumansMedicaidMedical InformaticsModels, EconometricNorth Carolina

Identifiers

PMID16779034
PMCPMC1560778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.