ArticleHealth policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2007
Reference drug programs: effectiveness and policy implications.
Article in Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Competition in pharmaceuticals: more product- than price-oriented?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2018Article
- Comprehensive taxonomy and worldwide trends in pharmaceutical policies in relation to country income status.BMC health services research · 2017Article
- Patients' knowledge and attitude towards therapeutic reference pricing system in Slovenia.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2016Article
- Pharmaceutical Price Schemes in Europe: Time for a 'Continental' One?PharmacoEconomics · 2016Article
- Addressing cost-related barriers to prescription drug use in Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2014Article
- Effectiveness, safety and cost of drug substitution in hypertension.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2010Article
- Comparison of tiered formularies and reference pricing policies: a systematic review.Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal · 2009Article
- Does knowledge of medication prices predict physicians' support for cost effective prescribing policies.The Canadian journal of clinical pharmacology = Journal canadien de pharmacologie clinique · 2008Article
- Developments in post-marketing comparative effectiveness research.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
In the current economic environment, health care systems are constantly struggling to contain rapidly rising costs. Drug costs are targeted by a wide variety of measures. Many jurisdictions have implemented reference drug programs (RDPs) or similar therapeutic substitution programs. This paper summarizes the mechanism and rationale of RDPs and presents evidence of their economic effectiveness and clinical safety. RDPs for pharmaceutical reimbursement are based on the assumption that drugs within specified medication groups are therapeutically equivalent and clinically interchangeable and that a common reimbursement level can thus be established. If the evidence documents that a higher price for a given drug does not buy greater effectiveness or reduced toxicity, then under RDP such extra costs are not covered. RDPs or therapeutic substitutions based on therapeutic equivalence are seen as logical extensions of generic substitution that is based on bioequivalence of drugs. If the goal is to achieve full drug coverage for as many patients as possible in the most efficient manner, then RDPs in combination with prior authorization programs are safer and more effective than simplistic fiscal drug policies, including fixed co-payments, co-insurances, or deductibles. RDPs will reduce spending in the less innovative but largest market, while fully covering all patients. Prior authorization will ensure that patients with a specified indication will benefit from the most innovative therapies with full coverage. In practice, however, not all patients and drugs will fit exactly into one of the two categories. Therefore, a process of medically indicated exemptions that will consider full coverage should accompany an RDP. In the current economic environment, health care systems are constantly struggling to contain rapidly rising costs. Drug costs are targeted by a wide variety of measures. Many jurisdictions have implemented reference drug programs, and others are considering them. This paper summarizes the mechanism and rationale of RDPs, presents evidence of their economic effectiveness and clinical safety, and concludes with some practical implications of implementing RDP policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.