Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16776824›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2006

Can antibiotic prescriptions in respiratory tract infections be improved? A cluster-randomized educational intervention in general practice--the Prescription Peer Academic Detailing (Rx-PAD) Study [NCT00272155].

Svein Gjelstad, Arne Fetveit, Jørund Straand, Ingvild Dalen, Sture Rognstad, Morten Lindbaek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Effects on antibiotic dispensing rates of interventions to promote delayed prescribing for respiratory tract infections in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
    Trial
  6. Prescription peer academic detailing to reduce inappropriate prescribing for older patients: a cluster randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Academic detailing as a method of continuing medical education.Advances in medical education and practice · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Resource use and costs of treating acute cough/lower respiratory tract infections in 13 European countries: results and challenges.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2011
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Delayed prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections: a qualitative study of GPs' views and experiences.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Svein GjelstadDepartment of General Practice and Community Medicine, University of Oslo, PO Box 1130 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway. svein.gjelstad@medisin.uio.no
Arne Fetveit
Jørund Straand
Ingvild Dalen
Sture Rognstad
Morten Lindbaek

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMore than half of all antibiotic prescriptions in general practice are issued for respiratory tract infections (RTIs), despite convincing evidence that many of these infections are caused by viruses. Frequent misuse of antimicrobial agents is of great global health concern, as we face an emerging worldwide threat of bacterial antibiotic resistance. There is an increasing need to identify determinants and patterns of antibiotic prescribing, in order to identify where clinical practice can be improved. METHODS/

designApproximately 80 peer continuing medical education (CME) groups in southern Norway will be recruited to a cluster randomized trial. Participating groups will be randomized either to an intervention- or a control group. A multifaceted intervention has been tailored, where key components are educational outreach visits to the CME-groups, work-shops, audit and feedback. Prescription Peer Academic Detailers (Rx-PADs), who are trained GPs, will conduct the educational outreach visits. During these visits, evidence-based recommendations of antibiotic prescriptions for RTIs will be presented and software will be handed out for installation in participants PCs, enabling collection of prescription data. These data will subsequently be linked to corresponding data from the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD). Individual feedback reports will be sent all participating GPs during and one year after the intervention. Main outcomes are baseline proportion of inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions for RTIs and change in prescription patterns compared to baseline one year after the initiation of the tailored pedagogic intervention. DISCUSSION: Improvement of prescription patterns in medical practice is a challenging task. A thorough evaluation of guidelines for antibiotic treatment in RTIs may impose important benefits, whereas inappropriate prescribing entails substantial costs, as well as undesirable consequences like development of antibiotic resistance. Our hypothesis is that an educational intervention program will be effective in improving prescription patterns by reducing the total number of antibiotic prescriptions, as well as reducing the amount of broad-spectrum antibiotics, with special emphasis on macrolides.

Indexed as

Drug Utilization ReviewEducation, Medical, ContinuingPractice Patterns, Physicians'Anti-Bacterial AgentsCluster AnalysisFamily PracticeHumansNorwayPractice Guidelines as TopicProgram EvaluationQuality Indicators, Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSoftwareAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID16776824
PMCPMC1569835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.