ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2006
Promulgation of guidelines for mucositis management: educating health care professionals and patients.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Strategies for disseminating recommendations or guidelines to patients: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2016Pooled it
- Systematic review of basic oral care for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013Pooled it
- The Role of Dental Oncology in Cancer Care: a Critical Component of Comprehensive Treatment, Education, and Interdisciplinary Collaboration- a Narrative Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Review
- The MASCC/ISOO Mucositis Guidelines Update: introduction to the first set of articles.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013Article
- Supportive care treatment guidelines: value, limitations, and opportunities.Seminars in oncology · 2011Review
- Mucositis guidelines: what have they achieved, and where to from here?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2006Review
- Developing evidence-based guidelines for management of alimentary mucositis: process and pitfalls.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2006Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) Mucositis and Patient and Professional Education Study Groups are collaborating to improve the promulgation of the updated mucositis management guidelines. The initial step in the collaboration was to survey cancer care health professionals to determine their awareness of the original 2004 guidelines and their opinions on the usefulness of patient educational materials based on the guidelines. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe authors surveyed four samples (three US and one European) of cancer health care professionals attending three cancer-related professional conferences between May and July 2005 using a ten-item questionnaire in both paper-and-pencil and web-based formats. Data were compiled and analyzed using descriptive statistics.
resultsAll respondents were generally aware of the importance of mucositis as a treatment-limiting toxicity with life-threatening complications and endorsed regular oral assessment and dental care practices. Only about one third of the US respondents were aware of the 2004 guidelines in contrast to 80% of the European respondents. A majority of respondents across all four surveys (66-93%) felt strongly that educational materials based on the guidelines were needed and that they would use them, while a smaller number (7-29%) indicated they might use them if a patient had a problem with mucositis.
conclusionsAwareness of the guidelines remains limited in the US, and use of the guidelines worldwide is minimal. The Mucositis and Patient and Professional Education Study Groups have developed a set of strategies to enhance dissemination, awareness, and use of the updated guidelines and to promote patient education based on the guidelines. Future work will focus on implementation and evaluation of the guidelines in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16775650What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.