Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16775258›Full record

ReviewAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology

Multiple sclerosis: the role of MR imaging.

Y Ge

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Brain oxygen extraction fraction mapping in patients with multiple sclerosis.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2022
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Differentiation of multiple sclerosis lesions and low-grade brain tumors on MRS data: machine learning approaches.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Y GeDepartment of Radiology/Center for Biomedical Imaging, New York University Medical Center, 650 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.

Funding

ZOPOLRESTAT IN SUBJECTS W/ PERIPHERAL SYMMETRICAL DIABETIC POLYNEUROPATHYM01RR000096 · NCRR · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BORKOWSKY, WILLIAM · 1985 to 2008
$34.8M
QUANTITATIVE MR IMAGING AND PROTON SPECTROSCOPY IN MSR37NS029029 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GROSSMAN, ROBERT I. · 1999 to 2005
$4.2M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000096NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR 00096NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS029029NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS 29029-11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MR offers by far the most sensitive technique for detecting multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions and has proved to be an important paraclinical tool for diagnosing MS and monitoring therapeutic trials. Technologic advances of MR in recent years have dramatically improved our understanding of MS disease. This review will focus on the contribution of MR imaging in MS and provide a discussion of conventional and advanced nonconventional MR techniques with regard to current findings, clinical correlations, and future directions.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingBrainHumansMultiple SclerosisSpinal Cord

Identifiers

PMID16775258
PMCPMC8133908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.