ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2006
Recommendations in relation to the EU clinical trials directive and medical research involving incapacitated adults.
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021Review
- Methodological challenges in European ethics approvals for a genetic epidemiology study in critically ill patients: the GenOSept experience.BMC medical ethics · 2019Article
- Medical research in emergency research in the European Union member states: tensions between theory and practice.Intensive care medicine · 2014Review
- Clinical research into the ICU: clouds at the horizon, once again.Intensive care medicine · 2013Article
- Medical teachers' attitudes towards science and motivational orientation for medical research.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2009Article
- Clinical research in Italy in adult patients unable to consent: after implementation of the European Union's Directive 2001/20/CE.Intensive care medicine · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16773486What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.