Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16773455›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2006

Injuries caused by small wheel devices.

Christina Brudvik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christina BrudvikDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen Accident and Emergency Department, PO 4500, 5838 Bergen, Norway. christina.brudvik@kir.uib.no
University of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We wanted to look for characteristics in injuries caused by rollerblades, skateboards and unmotorized kick scooters in order to recommend more targeted injury prevention. From September 2000 we did a two-year prospective registration of all small wheel device injuries attending Bergen Accident and Emergency Department's surgical unit. We registered a total of 273 injuries, and found an obvious difference in injury pattern between the three. Rollerbladers were more prone to fractures in their hands and arms, especially distal radial fractures, but also scaphoid fractures. This fracture is seldom in children, but not in child injuries caused by small wheel devices. Skateboarders were susceptible to ankle sprains and had the lowest injury severity among the three activities. Kick scooter users got mostly wound injuries, but had a high frequency of distal radial fractures with volar angulation, the Smith-type of fracture. There were also differences in user groups; 2/3 of injured rollerbladers were boys, mostly aged 12, a typical, injured skateboarder was a young male aged 13, and an injured kick scooter user was either an 11-year-old girl or boy. The use of effective wrist braces could have prevented most injuries in both rollerblading and kickscootering. Due to the high susceptibility of small wheel devices to uneven grounds resulting in falls, these activities should be prohibited in traffic and darkness. Preventive advice should preferably reach children aged 11 to 13.

Indexed as

Play and PlaythingsAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleUnited StatesWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID16773455
OpenAlexW1977679179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.