ReviewFunctional & integrative genomics2006
Ten years of bacterial genome sequencing: comparative-genomics-based discoveries.
Review in Functional & integrative genomics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed.
- IDBac: an open-access web platform to identify bacteria and analyze relationships in culture collections using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Review
- Comparative metagenomics using pan-metagenomic graphs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- CarpeDeam: a de novo metagenome assembler for heavily damaged ancient datasets.Genome biology · 2025Article
- IDBac: an open-access web platform and compendium for the identification of bacteria by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025Review
- Recent Advances in Genomics-Based Approaches for the Development of Intracellular Bacterial Pathogen Vaccines.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- The Prevalence ofMicroorganisms · 2022Review
- Assessment of the Degradation Potential and Genomic Insights towards Phenanthrene byMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Whole genome strategies and bioremediation insight into dehalogenase-producing bacteria.Molecular biology reports · 2021Review
- Genomic comparison of Clostridium chauvoei isolates from classical and visceral clinical manifestation.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2020Article
- Bacterial diversity and functional metagenomics expounding the diversity of xenobiotics, stress, defense and CRISPR gene ontology providing eco-efficiency to Himalayan Hot Springs.Functional & integrative genomics · 2020Article
- Comparative Genomics ofGenes · 2020Article
- Inhibition of Protein Secretion inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019Article
- Genome sequence and comparative analysis of Bacillus cereus BC04, reveals genetic diversity and alterations for antimicrobial resistance.Functional & integrative genomics · 2018Article
- The Xylella fastidosa RTX operons: evidence for the evolution of protein mosaics through novel genetic exchanges.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Genome Sequence and Metabolic Analysis of a Fluoranthene-Degrading StrainFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Review
- Surface proteome mining for identification of potential vaccine candidates against Campylobacter jejuni: an in silico approach.Functional & integrative genomics · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has been more than 10 years since the first bacterial genome sequence was published. Hundreds of bacterial genome sequences are now available for comparative genomics, and searching a given protein against more than a thousand genomes will soon be possible. The subject of this review will address a relatively straightforward question: "What have we learned from this vast amount of new genomic data?" Perhaps one of the most important lessons has been that genetic diversity, at the level of large-scale variation amongst even genomes of the same species, is far greater than was thought. The classical textbook view of evolution relying on the relatively slow accumulation of mutational events at the level of individual bases scattered throughout the genome has changed. One of the most obvious conclusions from examining the sequences from several hundred bacterial genomes is the enormous amount of diversity--even in different genomes from the same bacterial species. This diversity is generated by a variety of mechanisms, including mobile genetic elements and bacteriophages. An examination of the 20 Escherichia coli genomes sequenced so far dramatically illustrates this, with the genome size ranging from 4.6 to 5.5 Mbp; much of the variation appears to be of phage origin. This review also addresses mobile genetic elements, including pathogenicity islands and the structure of transposable elements. There are at least 20 different methods available to compare bacterial genomes. Metagenomics offers the chance to study genomic sequences found in ecosystems, including genomes of species that are difficult to culture. It has become clear that a genome sequence represents more than just a collection of gene sequences for an organism and that information concerning the environment and growth conditions for the organism are important for interpretation of the genomic data. The newly proposed Minimal Information about a Genome Sequence standard has been developed to obtain this information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16773396What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.