Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16773395›Full record

ArticleChromosoma2006

Abundance and chromosomal distribution of six Drosophila buzzatii transposons: BuT1, BuT2, BuT3, BuT4, BuT5, and BuT6.

Ferran Casals, Josefa González, Alfredo Ruiz

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosoma, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Low rates of homogenization of the DBC-150 satellite DNA family restricted to a single pair of microchromosomes in species from the Drosophila buzzatii cluster.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ferran CasalsDepartament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Josefa González
Alfredo Ruiz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The abundance and chromosomal distribution of six class-II transposable elements (TEs) of Drosophila buzzatii have been analyzed by Southern blotting and in situ hybridization. These six transposons had been previously found at the breakpoints of inversions 2j and 2q ( 7 ) of D. buzzatii. These two polymorphic inversions were generated by an ectopic recombination event between two copies of Galileo, a Foldback element. The four breakpoints became hotspots for TE insertions after the generation of the inversion and the transposons analyzed in this work are considered to be secondary invaders of these regions. Insertions of the six transposons are present in the euchromatin but show an increased density in the pericentromeric euchromatin-heterochromatin transition region and the dot chromosome. They are also more abundant in the inverted segments of chromosome 2 rearrangements. We further observed that the accumulation of TE insertions varies between elements and is correlated between dot, proximal regions, and inverted segments. These observations fully agree with previous data in Drosophila melanogaster and support recombination rate as the chief force explaining the chromosomal distribution of TEs.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceChromosome BreakageChromosome MappingDNA ProbesDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterGenome, InsectIn Situ HybridizationRecombination, GeneticSpecies SpecificityDNA ProbesDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.