ArticleInternational journal of integrated care2005
Integrated mental health services in England: a policy paradox.
Article in International journal of integrated care, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of implementation outcomes in an integrated mental healthcare trial in South Africa.Global health action · 2021Trial
- Transitions in health service use among women with poor mental health: a 7-year follow-up.Family medicine and community health · 2022Article
- Pharmacists in advanced clinical practice roles in emergency departments (PARED).International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2021Article
- Barriers and facilitators to integrating primary and specialist healthcare in the United Kingdom: a narrative literature review.Future healthcare journal · 2018Review
- Health policy and integrated mental health care in the SADC region: strategic clarification using the Rainbow Model.International journal of mental health systems · 2016Article
- The Efficiency of Mental Health Integration in Primary Health Care: a Ten-year Study.International journal of preventive medicine · 2012Article
- Treating substance abuse in primary care: a demonstration project.International journal of integrated care · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of health care policy on the development of integrated mental health services in England. DATA SOURCES: Drawing largely from a narrative review of the literature on adult mental health services published between January 1997 and February 2003 undertaken by the authors, we discuss three case studies of integrated care within primary care, secondary care and across the primary/secondary interface for people with serious mental illness.
conclusionWe suggest that while the central thrust of a raft of recent Government policies in England has been towards integration of different parts of the health care system, policy waterfalls and implementation failures, the adoption of ideas before they have been thoroughly tried and tested, a lack of clarity over roles and responsibilities and poor communication have led to an integration rhetoric/reality gap in practice. This has particular implications for people with serious mental health problems. DISCUSSION: We conclude with suggestions for strategies that may facilitate more integrated working.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.