Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16771507›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2006

Aptamers selected for higher-affinity binding are not more specific for the target ligand.

James M Carothers, Stephanie C Oestreich, Jack W Szostak

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Therapeutic Applications of Aptamers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James M CarothersDepartment of Molecular Biology, and Center for Computational and Integrative Biology 7215, Simches Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
Stephanie C Oestreich
Jack W Szostak
Massachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

IN VITRO SELECTION AND EVOLUTION OF NEW RIBOZYMESR01GM053936 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SZOSTAK, JACK W · 1996 to 2003
$864k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS GM53936NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM053936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous study of eleven different in vitro-selected RNA aptamers that bind guanosine triphosphate (GTP) with K(d)s ranging from 8 microM to 9 nM showed that more information is required to specify the structures of the higher-affinity aptamers. We are interested in understanding how the more complex aptamers achieve higher affinities for the ligand. In vitro selection produces structural solutions to a functional problem that are are as simple as possible in terms of the information content needed to define them. It has long been assumed that the simplest way to improve the affinity of an aptamer is to increase the shape and functional group complementarity of the RNA binding pocket for the ligand. This argument underlies the hypothesis that selection for higher-affinity aptamers automatically leads to structures that bind more specifically to the target molecule. Here, we examined the binding specificities of the eleven GTP aptamers by carrying out competition binding studies with sixteen different chemical analogues of GTP. The aptamers have distinct patterns of specificity, implying that each RNA is a structurally unique solution to the problem of GTP binding. However, these experiments failed to provide evidence that higher-affinity aptamers bind more specifically to GTP. We suggest that the simplest way to improve aptamer K(d)s may be to increase the stability of the RNA tertiary structure with additional intramolecular RNA-RNA interactions; increasingly specific ligand binding may emerge only in response to direct selection for specificity.

Indexed as

Aptamers, NucleotideBase SequenceBinding SitesGuanosine TriphosphateLigandsNucleic Acid ConformationRNAAptamers, NucleotideGuanosine TriphosphateLigandsRNA

Identifiers

PMID16771507
PMCPMC4287982
OpenAlexW1987864397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.