ArticleMaternal and child health journal2006
HIV testing among U.S. women during prenatal care: findings from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Self-efficacy and HIV testing among Latino emerging adults: examining the moderating effects of distress tolerance and sexual risk behaviors.AIDS care · 2020Article
- Characteristics associated with lack of HIV testing during pregnancy and delivery in 36 U.S. states, 2004-2013.International journal of STD & AIDS · 2018Article
- Estimated Perinatal HIV Infection Among Infants Born in the United States, 2002-2013.JAMA pediatrics · 2017Article
- Factors associated with human immunodeficiency virus screening of women during pregnancy, labor and delivery, United States, 2005-2006.Maternal and child health journal · 2014Article
- Routine prenatal HIV testing: women's concerns and their strategies for addressing concerns.Maternal and child health journal · 2012Article
- A review of missed opportunities for prenatal HIV screening in a nationwide sample of health facilities in the Indian Health Service.Journal of community health · 2011Article
- False-positive human immunodeficiency virus enzyme immunoassay results in pregnant women.PloS one · 2011Article
- Trends and correlates of HIV testing during pregnancy in racially/ethnically diverse insured population, 1997-2006.Maternal and child health journal · 2009Article
- Prenatal HIV testing in the US-Mexico border region, 2005: the Brownsville-Matamoros Sister City Project for Women's Health.Preventing chronic disease · 2008Article
- Testing for HIV infection in the United States.Current infectious disease reports · 2007Article
- Pregnancy and HIV infection in young women in North Carolina.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo measure progress toward the US Public Health Service recommended goal that HIV screening be part of the routine battery of prenatal tests for all pregnant women, using data from a nationally-representative reproductive health survey.
methodsData from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) measure self-reported prenatal HIV testing for all women who had a completed pregnancy in the 12 months before interview. We estimated the percentage with a prenatal test for categories defined by major socio-economic groups, HIV risk, knowledge of HIV treatment, and access to health care.
resultsSixty-nine percent of 748 recently pregnant women reported receiving a prenatal HIV test. The percentage tested was significantly higher for women with incomes below 300% of the poverty level (76%) and women who reported some degree of HIV risk (82%), suggesting that prenatal care providers offer and encourage testing based on perceived risk, even though universal HIV screening is recommended. Testing was also higher among women with knowledge of interventions to prevent perinatal HIV transmission (74%), suggesting that more public information on these treatments might be helpful.
conclusionsA national estimate indicates that nearly one in 3 recently pregnant women reported they were not tested for HIV during prenatal care. Studies showing that prenatal testing for other infectious diseases can approach 100% suggest that a similar level of testing is attainable for perinatal HIV screening, particularly if it is incorporated into the routine package of prenatal tests and procedures offered to all pregnant women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.