ReviewEuropean radiology2006
A practical guide to diagnose lesser-known immediate and delayed contrast media-induced adverse cutaneous reactions.
Review in European radiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnosis and Prevention of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Iodinated Contrast Media.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2022Review
- Hypersensitivity Reactions to Iodinated Contrast Media.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Lower dose and lower injection speed of iodinated contrast media: a new strategy to reduce the incidence rate of immediate hypersensitivity reactions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2020Article
- Late adverse reactions to intravascular iodine based contrast media: an update.European radiology · 2011Article
- Letter to the editor: Diagnostic procedures and case related information in ICM-induced hypersensitivity.The British journal of radiology · 2011Article
- Recent hot topics in contrast media.European radiology · 2011Review
- Fixed drug eruption induced by an iodinated non-ionic X-ray contrast medium: a practical approach to identify the causative agent and to prevent its recurrence.European radiology · 2007Article
- Induction of upregulation and downregulation of the T-cell activation marker CD98 in patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT with iodinated non-ionic dimeric contrast medium.Korean journal of radiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The terms "immediate" and "delayed" adverse reactions induced by contrast media (CM) refer to the reactions' onset but do not provide substantial information concerning the clinical manifestation, the potential risk factors, the treatment modalities, or prevention. Because a variety of different reactions caused by different pathophysiological mechanisms may arise immediately or be delayed after CM injection, and because these need different management, the aim of the present paper is to present the clinical features and to exactly characterize lesser-known cutaneous reactions. A thorough knowledge of the clinical features, their adequate treatment, and, possibly, the subsequent diagnostic procedure for preventing recurrence after reexposure to CM would improve patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16770655What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.