ArticleGut2006
Site distribution of gastrointestinal carcinoids differs between races.
Article in Gut, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinicopathological characteristics of rectal multiple neuroendocrine neoplasms and literature review.BMC surgery · 2023Review
- Comparison between endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap and endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors.BMC surgery · 2022Article
- Evaluation of treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumors sized under 20 mm in comparison with the WHO 2010 guidelines.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2017Article
- Evaluation of the risk factors associated with rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a big data analytic study from a health screening center.Journal of gastroenterology · 2016Article
- Clinicopathological features and immunoexpression profiles of goblet cell carcinoid and typical carcinoid of the appendix.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2011Article
- Treatment of colorectal carcinoids: A new paradigm.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2010Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16766760PMC1856341What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.