ReviewBiological research for nursing2006
From bedside to bench and back again: research issues in animal models of human disease.
Review in Biological research for nursing, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Thermal, Hematohistological, and Dermatological Biocompatibility of LED Devices for Neonatal Phototherapy.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Evaluation and research progress on rodent models of late-onset hypogonadism: a comprehensive review.The Canadian journal of urology · 2025Review
- Strategies for optimization of hypoglycemia rat models.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- "Trust your gut": exploring the connection between gut microbiome dysbiosis and the advancement of Metabolic Associated Steatosis Liver Disease (MASLD)/Metabolic Associated Steatohepatitis (MASH): a systematic review of animal and human studies.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Article
- Patient oriented research in mental health: matching laboratory to life and beyond in Canada.Research involvement and engagement · 2021Article
- Cardiovascular fitness and structural brain integrity: an update on current evidence.GeroScience · 2020Review
- Animal models in genomic research: Techniques, applications, and roles for nurses.Applied nursing research : ANR · 2016Article
- Animal models and conserved processes.Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2012Article
- Animal models of the cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To improve outcomes for patients with many serious clinical problems, multifactorial research approaches by nurse scientists, including the use of animal models, are necessary. Animal models serve as analogies for clinical problems seen in humans and must meet certain criteria, including validity and reliability, to be useful in moving research efforts forward. This article describes research considerations in the development of rodent models. As the standard of diabetes care evolves to emphasize intensive insulin therapy, rates of severe hypoglycemia are increasing among patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A consequence of this change in clinical practice is an increase in rates of two hypoglycemia-related diabetes complications: hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure (HAAF) and resulting hypoglycemia unawareness. Work on an animal model of HAAF is in an early developmental stage, with several labs reporting different approaches to model this complication of type 1 diabetes mellitus. This emerging model serves as an example illustrating how evaluation of validity and reliability is critically important at each stage of developing and testing animal models to support inquiry into human disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.