Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16766411›Full record

ReviewNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2006

Biomarkers to assess the utility of potential reduced exposure tobacco products.

Dorothy K Hatsukami, Neal L Benowitz, Stephen I Rennard, Cheryl Oncken, Stephen S Hecht

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. A pilot randomized study of smokeless tobacco use among smokers not interested in quitting: changes in smoking behavior and readiness to quit.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2010
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A CHRNA5 Smoking Risk Variant Decreases the Aversive Effects of Nicotine in Humans.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Evaluation of health promotion programmes in severe mental illness: theory and practice.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2015
    Article
  16. Urinary biomarkers of smokers' exposure to tobacco smoke constituents in tobacco products assessment: a fit for purpose approach.Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals · 2013
    Article
  17. Lung cancer biomarkers for the assessment of modified risk tobacco products: an oxidative stress perspective.Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals · 2013
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Tobacco and nicotine product testing.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2012
    Review
  20. Research opportunities related to establishing standards for tobacco products under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dorothy K HatsukamiTobacco Use Research Center, University of Minnesota Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA. hatsu001@umn.edu
Neal L Benowitz
Stephen I Rennard
Cheryl Oncken
Stephen S Hecht

Funding

TOBACCO REDUCTION STRATEGIES FOR PATIENTS WITH CARDIAC DISEASEP50DA013333 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI HATSUKAMI, DOROTHY K · 1999 to 2008
$16.8M
Nicotine Replacement Treatment for Pregnant SmokersR01DA015167 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI ONCKEN, CHERYL ANN · 2002 to 2006
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS DA013333NIDA NIH HHS DA0227NIDA NIH HHS DA15167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, we have no valid biomarkers that serve as proxies for tobacco-related disease to test potential reduced exposure products. This paper represents the deliberations of four workgroups that focused on four tobacco-related heath outcomes: Cancer, nonmalignant pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease, and fetal toxicity. The goal of these workgroups was to identify biomarkers that offer some promise as measures of exposure or toxicity and ultimately may serve as indicators for future disease risk. Recommendations were based on the relationship of the biomarker to what is known about mechanisms of tobacco-related pathogenesis, the extent to which the biomarker differs among smokers and nonsmokers, and the sensitivity of the biomarker to changes in smoking status. Other promising biomarkers were discussed. No existing biomarkers have been demonstrated to be predictive of tobacco-related disease, which highlights the importance and urgency of conducting research in this area.

Indexed as

Smoking PreventionBiomarkersCardiovascular DiseasesEnvironmental MonitoringFetal DiseasesHumansInhalation ExposureLung NeoplasmsRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificitySmokingTobacco Smoke PollutionBiomarkersTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.