Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16763796›Full record

ReviewDer Internist2006

[Clinical pathway "Acute Coronary Syndrome"].

W Grimm, B Maisch

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Internist, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

W GrimmKlinik für Innere Medizin, Schwerpunkt Kardiologie, Angiologie und Intensivmedizin, Philipps-Universität Marburg.
B Maisch
Philipps University of Marburg · DEUniversitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical pathway "acute coronary syndrome" of the university hospital Marburg describes the guideline-conform and consented management of patients with ST-segment elevation infarct (STEMI), non-ST-segment elevation infarct (NSTEMI) and Troponin negative unstable angina. A 12-lead ECG recording is made and read in all patients within 10 minutes. All patients with STEMI undergo immediate revascularisation using primary percutanuous catheter intervention (PCI) after administration of basic medical therapy. Primary PCI is also used in all patients with NSTEMI, persistent chest pain, rhythm or hemodynamic instability. Patients with unstable angina, who became free of symptoms after application of basic medication, but who have additional risk factors undergo cardiac catheterisation within 48 hours. Acute myocardial infarction can be ruled out in patients with twofold negative cardiac troponin levels during 6-12 hours. In the absence of further symptoms, these patiens undergo differential diagnostic evaluation of cardiac and extracardiac causes of chest pain. The introduction of this clinical pathway 2 years ago, which was consented before by the hospital board and the clinical directors, has lead to a remarkable improvement in the clinical decision-making at the emergency room of the hospital and reduced the door to intervention time considerably.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAngina, UnstableCritical PathwaysDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedGermanyHumansInterprofessional RelationsMyocardial InfarctionPatient Care TeamPlanning TechniquesSyndrome

Identifiers

PMID16763796
OpenAlexW153728344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.