ArticleClinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society2006
The outcome of ganglion clipping in hyperhidrosis and blushing.
Article in Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thoracic sympathectomy: a review of current indications.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Review
- The correlation between the method of sympathetic ablation for palmar hyperhidrosis and the occurrence of compensatory hyperhidrosis: a review.World journal of surgery · 2008Review
- Why are we using surgery as a first line of treatment for an anxiety disorder?Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2006Article
- The level of ganglion clipping for hyperhidrosis.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2006Article
- Sympathectomy for hyperhidrosis: should we place the clamps at T2-T3 or T3-T4?Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A total of 114 patients with various sympathetic disorders underwent endoscopic sympathetic block over different thoracic ganglions by the clipping method. The advantages of this method include the recognition of the clipped level, changeability, and reversibility. However, 4.4% of patients were unilaterally clipped at the wrong level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.