ArticleJournal of biology2006
Comprehensive curation and analysis of global interaction networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Article in Journal of biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 149 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
149 citing papers in PubMed.
- TOMOC: a topology-driven multi-objective evolutionary framework for robust overlapping protein complex detection in noisy PPI networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Network Comparison with Interpretable Contrastive Network Representation Learning.Journal of data science, statistics, and visualisation · 2022Article
- Functional compensation of mouse duplicates by their paralogs expressed in the same tissues.Genome biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Inferring functional communities from partially observed biological networks exploiting geometric topology and side information.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Computational methods, databases and tools for synthetic lethality prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Review
- Computational identification of protein complexes from network interactions: Present state, challenges, and the way forward.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Computed structures of core eukaryotic protein complexes.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- The BioGRID database: A comprehensive biomedical resource of curated protein, genetic, and chemical interactions.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021Article
- Comparing the utility of in vivo transposon mutagenesis approaches in yeast species to infer gene essentiality.Current genetics · 2020Article
- Extreme Antagonism Arising from Gene-Environment Interactions.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
- A multidimensional systems biology analysis of cellular senescence in aging and disease.Genome biology · 2020Article
- Article
- Fusing gene expressions and transitive protein-protein interactions for inference of gene regulatory networks.BMC systems biology · 2019Article
- Protein-Protein Interactions inFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Review
- REFINING CELLULAR PATHWAY MODELS USING AN ENSEMBLE OF HETEROGENEOUS DATA SOURCES.The annals of applied statistics · 2018Article
- Experimental evolution of diverse Escherichia coli metabolic mutants identifies genetic loci for convergent adaptation of growth rate.PLoS genetics · 2018Article
- The BioGRID interaction database: 2017 update.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- Protein complexes predictions within protein interaction networks using genetic algorithms.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- BioGRID: A Resource for Studying Biological Interactions in Yeast.Cold Spring Harbor protocols · 2016Article
- Use of the BioGRID Database for Analysis of Yeast Protein and Genetic Interactions.Cold Spring Harbor protocols · 2016Article
89 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe study of complex biological networks and prediction of gene function has been enabled by high-throughput (HTP) methods for detection of genetic and protein interactions. Sparse coverage in HTP datasets may, however, distort network properties and confound predictions. Although a vast number of well substantiated interactions are recorded in the scientific literature, these data have not yet been distilled into networks that enable system-level inference.
resultsWe describe here a comprehensive database of genetic and protein interactions, and associated experimental evidence, for the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as manually curated from over 31,793 abstracts and online publications. This literature-curated (LC) dataset contains 33,311 interactions, on the order of all extant HTP datasets combined. Surprisingly, HTP protein-interaction datasets currently achieve only around 14% coverage of the interactions in the literature. The LC network nevertheless shares attributes with HTP networks, including scale-free connectivity and correlations between interactions, abundance, localization, and expression. We find that essential genes or proteins are enriched for interactions with other essential genes or proteins, suggesting that the global network may be functionally unified. This interconnectivity is supported by a substantial overlap of protein and genetic interactions in the LC dataset. We show that the LC dataset considerably improves the predictive power of network-analysis approaches. The full LC dataset is available at the BioGRID (http://www.thebiogrid.org) and SGD (http://www.yeastgenome.org/) databases.
conclusionComprehensive datasets of biological interactions derived from the primary literature provide critical benchmarks for HTP methods, augment functional prediction, and reveal system-level attributes of biological networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.