Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16762047›Full record

ArticleJournal of biology2006

Comprehensive curation and analysis of global interaction networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Teresa Reguly, Ashton Breitkreutz, Lorrie Boucher, Bobby-Joe Breitkreutz, Gary C Hon, Chad L Myers, Ainslie Parsons, Helena Friesen, Rose Oughtred, Amy Tong and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 149 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
149citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

149 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Network Comparison with Interpretable Contrastive Network Representation Learning.Journal of data science, statistics, and visualisation · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Protein-Protein Interactions inFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

89 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Teresa Reguly *Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto ON M5G 1X5, Canada.
Ashton Breitkreutz *Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto ON M5G 1X5, Canada.
Lorrie Boucher *Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto ON M5G 1X5, Canada.
Bobby-Joe Breitkreutz *Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto ON M5G 1X5, Canada.
Gary C HonDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0412, USA.
Chad L MyersLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Washington Road, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Ainslie ParsonsDepartment of Medical Genetics and Microbiology, University of Toronto, Toronto ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
Helena FriesenBanting and Best Department of Medical Research, University of Toronto, Toronto ON M5G 1L6, Canada.
Rose OughtredLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Washington Road, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Amy TongDepartment of Medical Genetics and Microbiology, University of Toronto, Toronto ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
Chris StarkSamuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto ON M5G 1X5, Canada.
Yuen HoBanting and Best Department of Medical Research, University of Toronto, Toronto ON M5G 1L6, Canada.
David BotsteinLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Washington Road, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Brenda AndrewsDepartment of Medical Genetics and Microbiology, University of Toronto, Toronto ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
Charles BooneDepartment of Medical Genetics and Microbiology, University of Toronto, Toronto ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
Olga G TroyanskyaLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Washington Road, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Trey IdekerDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0412, USA.
Kara DolinskiLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Washington Road, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Nizar N Batada *Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto ON M5G 1X5, Canada.
Mike TyersSamuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto ON M5G 1X5, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study of complex biological networks and prediction of gene function has been enabled by high-throughput (HTP) methods for detection of genetic and protein interactions. Sparse coverage in HTP datasets may, however, distort network properties and confound predictions. Although a vast number of well substantiated interactions are recorded in the scientific literature, these data have not yet been distilled into networks that enable system-level inference.

resultsWe describe here a comprehensive database of genetic and protein interactions, and associated experimental evidence, for the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as manually curated from over 31,793 abstracts and online publications. This literature-curated (LC) dataset contains 33,311 interactions, on the order of all extant HTP datasets combined. Surprisingly, HTP protein-interaction datasets currently achieve only around 14% coverage of the interactions in the literature. The LC network nevertheless shares attributes with HTP networks, including scale-free connectivity and correlations between interactions, abundance, localization, and expression. We find that essential genes or proteins are enriched for interactions with other essential genes or proteins, suggesting that the global network may be functionally unified. This interconnectivity is supported by a substantial overlap of protein and genetic interactions in the LC dataset. We show that the LC dataset considerably improves the predictive power of network-analysis approaches. The full LC dataset is available at the BioGRID (http://www.thebiogrid.org) and SGD (http://www.yeastgenome.org/) databases.

conclusionComprehensive datasets of biological interactions derived from the primary literature provide critical benchmarks for HTP methods, augment functional prediction, and reveal system-level attributes of biological networks.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProtein Interaction MappingSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16762047
PMCPMC1561585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.