Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16760322›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2006

Early antibody responses to experimental Mycobacterium bovis infection of cattle.

W R Waters, M V Palmer, T C Thacker, J P Bannantine, H M Vordermeier, R G Hewinson, R Greenwald, J Esfandiari, J McNair, J M Pollock and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. B Cell and Antibody Responses in Bovine Tuberculosis.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Animal models for COVID-19 and tuberculosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Veterinary world · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Global Distribution and Evolution ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Modeling the Accuracy of TwoFrontiers in veterinary science · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

W R WatersBacterial Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, United States Department of Agriculture, P.O. Box 70, Ames, IA 50010-0070, USA. rwaters@nadc.ars.usda.gov
M V Palmer
T C Thacker
J P Bannantine
H M Vordermeier
R G Hewinson
R Greenwald
J Esfandiari
J McNair
J M Pollock
P Andersen
K P Lyashchenko

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bovine tuberculosis persists as a costly zoonotic disease in numerous countries despite extensive eradication and control efforts. Sequential serum samples obtained from Mycobacterium bovis-infected cattle were evaluated for seroreactivity to mycobacterial antigens. Animals received M. bovis by aerosol, intratonsil, intranasal, or intratracheal inoculation. Assays included the multiantigen print immunoassay for determination of antigen recognition patterns, immunoblot analysis for sensitive kinetic studies, and the VetTB STAT-PAK test, a novel, rapid test based on lateral-flow technology. Responses to MPB83 were detected for all M. bovis-infected animals regardless of the route or strain of M. bovis used for inoculation. Other less commonly recognized antigens included ESAT-6, CFP-10, and MPB70. Responses to MPB83 were detectable as early as 4 weeks after inoculation, were boosted upon injection of purified protein derivatives for skin testing, and persisted throughout the course of each of the four challenge studies. MPB83-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) was detected prior to MPB83-specific IgG detection; however, early IgM responses rapidly waned, suggesting a benefit of tests that detect both IgM- and IgG-specific antibodies. The VetTB STAT-PAK test detected responses in sera from 60% (15/25) of the animals by 7 weeks after challenge and detected responses in 96% (24/25) of the animals by 18 weeks. These findings demonstrate the potential for new-generation antibody-based tests for the early detection of M. bovis infection in cattle.

Indexed as

Mycobacterium bovisAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntibody FormationAntigens, BacterialCattleEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayTime FactorsTuberculin TestTuberculosis, BovineVaccinationAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID16760322
PMCPMC1489550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.