Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16759380›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2006

Genomic divergences among cattle, dog and human estimated from large-scale alignments of genomic sequences.

George E Liu, Lakshmi K Matukumalli, Tad S Sonstegard, Larry L Shade, Curtis P Van Tassell

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sequencing and annotated analysis of full genome of Holstein breed bull.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Characterization and distribution of retrotransposons and simple sequence repeats in the bovine genome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Reconstruction of the ancestral ferungulate karyotype by electronic chromosome painting (E-painting).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

George E LiuUSDA, ARS, ANRI, Bovine Functional Genomics Laboratory, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (BARC)-East, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA. gliu@anri.barc.usda.gov
Lakshmi K Matukumalli
Tad S Sonstegard
Larry L Shade
Curtis P Van Tassell

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 11 Mb of finished high quality genomic sequences were sampled from cattle, dog and human to estimate genomic divergences and their regional variation among these lineages.

resultsOptimal three-way multi-species global sequence alignments for 84 cattle clones or loci (each >50 kb of genomic sequence) were constructed using the human and dog genome assemblies as references. Genomic divergences and substitution rates were examined for each clone and for various sequence classes under different functional constraints. Analysis of these alignments revealed that the overall genomic divergences are relatively constant (0.32-0.37 change/site) for pairwise comparisons among cattle, dog and human; however substitution rates vary across genomic regions and among different sequence classes. A neutral mutation rate (2.0-2.2 x 10(-9) change/site/year) was derived from ancestral repetitive sequences, whereas the substitution rate in coding sequences (1.1 x 10(-9) change/site/year) was approximately half of the overall rate (1.9-2.0 x 10(-9) change/site/year). Relative rate tests also indicated that cattle have a significantly faster rate of substitution as compared to dog and that this difference is about 6%.

conclusionThis analysis provides a large-scale and unbiased assessment of genomic divergences and regional variation of substitution rates among cattle, dog and human. It is expected that these data will serve as a baseline for future mammalian molecular evolution studies.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationSequence AlignmentAnimalsBase SequenceCattleDogsFemaleGenomeGenomicsHumansMaleMutationPan troglodytesRatsSex Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID16759380
PMCPMC1525190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.