Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16757587›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2006

Candidemia in Norway (1991 to 2003): results from a nationwide study.

Per Sandven, Lars Bevanger, Asbjørn Digranes, Hanne H Haukland, Turid Mannsåker, Peter Gaustad, Norwegian Yeast Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An update on clinically relevant, rare, and emergingClinical microbiology reviews · 2025
    Review
  4. Case reports in infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  5. Case report:Medical mycology case reports · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Prevalence and Species Distribution ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Iranian journal of public health · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Molecular Methods for the Diagnosis of Invasive Candidiasis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  12. Resistance rates of non-Infection and drug resistance · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Estimating the Burden of Serious Fungal Infections in Uruguay.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
  16. An Estimate of the Burden of Fungal Disease in Norway.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Comparison of BACTEC™ blood culture media for the detection of fungemia.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Per SandvenInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet Medical Center, Oslo, Norway. per.sandven@fhi.no
Lars Bevanger
Asbjørn Digranes
Hanne H Haukland
Turid Mannsåker
Peter Gaustad
Norwegian Yeast Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A long-term, nationwide prospective candidemia study has been ongoing in Norway since 1991. All medical microbiological laboratories in the country have participated. During the period 1991 to 2003 a total of 1,393 episodes of candidemia occurred in 1,348 patients. The incidence of candidemia episodes per 100,000 inhabitants increased from approximately 2 episodes in the early 1990s to 3 episodes in 2001 to 2003. The average annual incidences varied markedly between the age groups. The incidence was high in patients aged < 1 year and in patients aged > or = 70 years. In patients > or = 80 years of age, the incidence has increased during the last 3 years from an annual average of 6.5 to 15.6 cases/100,000 inhabitants in 2003. Four Candida species (C. albicans [70%], C. glabrata [13%], C. tropicalis [7%], and C. parapsilosis [6%]) accounted for 95.5% of the isolates. The species distribution has been constant during the 13-year study period. The distribution of the most important species varied with the age of the patient. In patients < 1 year of age, the majority of episodes were caused by C. albicans (91%). The occurrence of C. glabrata increased with age. In patients > or = 80 years of age, approximately 1/3 of all episodes were due to this species. All C. albicans strains were susceptible to fluconazole. The percentage of yeast isolates with decreased susceptibility to fluconazole (MICs > or = 16 microg/ml) was 10.7% during the first period of this study (1991 to 1996) and 11.7% during the second period (1997 to 2003).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionAntifungal AgentsCandidaCandida albicansCandidiasisChildChild, PreschoolFluconazoleFungemiaHumansIncidenceInfantAntifungal AgentsFluconazole

Identifiers

PMID16757587
PMCPMC1489391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.