ArticleThe Ulster medical journal2006
The 2005 Rose Prize Essay. GP Education in Northern Ireland 1920-1990. A study of the use and misuse of power.
Article in The Ulster medical journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- General practitioner education in Northern Ireland--the use and misuse of power.The Ulster medical journal · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use and misuse of power has been demonstrated. It has been shown that GP education has changed very significantly between 1920 and 1990. Many excellent improvements have been achieved. Nevertheless, despite these gains, it is quite impossible to accept the hypothesis that there has been a constant steady improvement through history to the present perfect state (so-called Whiggism). Rather, it is clear that each and every one of the participants who provided GP medical education in Northern Ireland have made mistakes, of varying magnitude. However, the hypothesis of the conflict perspective is proven--the inevitable competition for power and the struggle for control were ever-present, and have been illustrated. This paper acknowledges that it is axiomatic that the medical profession should teach both its 'apprentices' and CME. For the medical profession to achieve a more independent position in this provision, the powers of state and the pharmaceutical industry would have to be curbed or controlled--in short, realigned. To reach this goal the medical profession's future planners would need to change. The various cliques would have to become a unified force. Only then would they have sufficient power to orchestrate and achieve the profession's proposals for GP education. An armistice could be agreed by the warrior bands (hospital consultants, the multiplicity of royal colleges including RCGP, and medico-political bodies such as the BMA) to allow this to happen. At this point, successful renegotiation of the conditions for GP education could become a real possibility. As a postscript, it must be acknowledged that there have been a great many significant developments in GP education since 1990; some are listed in Table II. These will require research elsewhere. Nevertheless, even after a further 15 years, the hypothesis remains sound; the competition for power and struggle for control are constants, and the schisms within medical education continue unabated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16755945PMC1891731What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.