Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16755400›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2006

Social marketing: planning before conceiving preconception care.

Christine E Prue, Katherine Lyon Daniel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Developing social marketed individual preconception care consultations: Which consumer preferences should it meet?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The business case for preconception care: methods and issues.Maternal and child health journal · 2006
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christine E PrueCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, MS E86, Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA. cprue@cdc.gov
Katherine Lyon Daniel
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social marketing approaches can help to shape the formation of and to create demand for preconception care services. This article describes four components of social marketing, often referred to as the 4 P's, that should be carefully researched and set in place before a national effort to launch and sustain preconception care services is pursued. First, the product or package of services must be defined and adapted using the latest in scientific and health care standards and must be based on consumer needs and desires. Second, the pricing of the services in financial or opportunity costs must be acceptable to the consumer, insurers, and health care service providers. Third, the promotion of benefits must be carefully crafted to reach and appeal to both consumers and providers. Fourth, the placement and availability of services in the marketplace must be researched and planned. With the application of market research practices that incorporate health behavior theories in their exploration of each component, consumer demand for preconception care can be generated, and providers can take preconception care to the market with confidence.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorSocial MarketingFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaternal WelfareNeeds AssessmentPreconception CarePrenatal CareReproductive MedicineTime FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID16755400
PMCPMC1592143
OpenAlexW2003597128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.