ArticleThe Canadian journal of cardiology2006
Innovations in primary care: implication for hypertension detection and treatment.
Article in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The 2007 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations: the scientific summary - an annual update.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2007Guideline
- A framework for chronic care quality: results of a scoping review and Delphi survey.Global health action · 2024Article
- Quality of care for chronic conditions: identifying specificities of quality aims based on scoping review and Delphi survey.Global health action · 2024Article
- Digitally Enabled Health Service for the Integrated Management of Hypertension: A Participatory User-Centred Design Process.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Harmonization of guidelines for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease: the C-CHANGE Initiative.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2011Article
- Agency social workers could monitor hypertension in the community.Social work in health care · 2010Article
- Why some adult Canadians do not have blood pressure measured.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2007Article
- Implementation of recommendations on hypertension: the Canadian Hypertension Education Program.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The majority of hypertension detection and management in Canada is provided by family physicians. Although various organizations have called attention to the poor rates of hypertension detection and control on a worldwide basis, the tools and infrastructure that allow for better hypertension management have generally been lacking in primary care. Recent advances in the fields of primary care and chronic disease management have led to the development of frameworks wherein chronic diseases such as hypertension can be more effectively managed. Such paradigms integrate the primary care physician, the specialist, technologies, and a wide variety of health system and community resources to provide optimal care to the patient with hypertension. The present review highlights many of the advances in primary health care delivery in Canada that apply to hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.