Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16753342›Full record

ReviewTrends in immunology2006

Interfering antiviral immunity: application, subversion, hope?

N Manjunath, Priti Kumar, Sang Kyung Lee, Premlata Shankar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in immunology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Protection against TNFα-dependent liver toxicity by intraperitoneal liposome delivered DsiRNA targeting TNFα in vivo.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2012
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. RNAi-mediated CCR5 silencing by LFA-1-targeted nanoparticles prevents HIV infection in BLT mice.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2010
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Lentiviral delivery of short hairpin RNAs.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2009
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

N ManjunathThe CBR Institute for Biomedical Research and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Priti Kumar
Sang Kyung Lee
Premlata Shankar

Funding

RNA INTERFERENCE AS A WEAPON AGAINST BIOTERRORISMU19AI056900 · NIAID · IMMUNE DISEASE INSTITUTE, INC. · PI LIEBERMAN, JUDY · 2003 to 2007
$11.9M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI 056900NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI056900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA interference (RNAi), initially recognized as a natural antiviral mechanism in plants, has rapidly emerged as an invaluable tool to suppress gene expression in a sequence-specific manner in all organisms, including mammals. Its potential to inhibit the replication of a variety of viruses has been demonstrated in vitro and in vivo in mouse and monkey models. These results have generated profound interest in the use of this technology as a potential treatment strategy for viral infections for which vaccines and drugs are unavailable or inadequate. In this review, we discuss the progress made within the past 2-3 years towards harnessing the potential of RNAi for clinical application in viral infections and the hurdles that have yet to be overcome.

Indexed as

RNA InterferenceAnimalsHumansRNA, Small InterferingVirus DiseasesRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID16753342
PMCPMC7185794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.