Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16753066›Full record

ArticleBMC molecular biology2006

Locked nucleoside analogues expand the potential of DNAzymes to cleave structured RNA targets.

Birte Vester, Lykke H Hansen, Lars Bo Lundberg, B Ravindra Babu, Mads D Sørensen, Jesper Wengel, Stephen Douthwaite

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC molecular biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Birte VesterThe Nucleic Acid Center, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark. b.vester@bmb.sdu.dk
Lykke H Hansen
Lars Bo Lundberg
B Ravindra Babu
Mads D Sørensen
Jesper Wengel
Stephen Douthwaite
University of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNAzymes cleave at predetermined sequences within RNA. A prerequisite for cleavage is that the DNAzyme can gain access to its target, and thus the DNAzyme must be capable of unfolding higher-order structures that are present in the RNA substrate. However, in many cases the RNA target sequence is hidden in a region that is too tightly structured to be accessed under physiological conditions by DNAzymes.

resultsWe investigated how incorporation of LNA (locked nucleic acid) monomers into DNAzymes improves their ability to gain access and cleave at highly-structured RNA targets. The binding arms of DNAzymes were varied in length and were substituted with up to three LNA and alpha-L-LNA monomers (forming LNAzymes). For one DNAzyme, the overall cleavage reaction proceeded fifty times faster after incorporation of two alpha-L-LNA monomers per binding arm (kobs increased from 0.014 min-1 to 0.78 min-1).

conclusionThe data demonstrate how hydrolytic performance can be enhanced by design of LNAzymes, and indicate that there are optimal lengths for the binding arms and for the number of modified LNA monomers.

Indexed as

Base SequenceDNA, CatalyticKineticsMolecular Sequence DataOligonucleotidesOligonucleotides, AntisenseRNADNA, Catalyticlocked nucleic acidOligonucleotidesOligonucleotides, AntisenseRNA

Identifiers

PMID16753066
PMCPMC1501032
OpenAlexW1513052362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.