Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16751803›Full record

ArticleOncogene2006

DNA copy number amplification profiling of human neoplasms.

S Myllykangas, J Himberg, T Böhling, B Nagy, J Hollmén, S Knuutila

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Molecular Deregulation ofFrontiers in oncology · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Whole-Exome Sequencing of Sinonasal Small Cell Carcinoma Arising within a Papillary Schneiderian Carcinoma In Situ.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2018
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Enhanced MAF Oncogene Expression and Breast Cancer Bone Metastasis.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

S MyllykangasDepartment of Pathology, Haartman Institute and HUSLAB, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. samuel.myllykangas@helsinki.fi
J Himberg
T Böhling
B Nagy
J Hollmén
S Knuutila
Helsinki University Hospital · FIHelsinki Institute for Information Technology · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA copy number amplifications activate oncogenes and are hallmarks of nearly all advanced tumors. Amplified genes represent attractive targets for therapy, diagnostics and prognostics. To investigate DNA amplifications in different neoplasms, we performed a bibliomics survey using 838 published chromosomal comparative genomic hybridization studies and collected amplification data at chromosome band resolution from more than 4500 cases. Amplification profiles were determined for 73 distinct neoplasms. Neoplasms were clustered according to the amplification profiles, and frequently amplified chromosomal loci (amplification hot spots) were identified using computational modeling. To investigate the site specificity and mechanisms of gene amplifications, colocalization of amplification hot spots, cancer genes, fragile sites, virus integration sites and gene size cohorts were tested in a statistical framework. Amplification-based clustering demonstrated that cancers with similar etiology, cell-of-origin or topographical location have a tendency to obtain convergent amplification profiles. The identified amplification hot spots were colocalized with the known fragile sites, cancer genes and virus integration sites, but global statistical significance could not be ascertained. Large genes were significantly overrepresented on the fragile sites and the reported amplification hot spots. These findings indicate that amplifications are selected in the cancer tissue environment according to the qualitative traits and localization of cancer genes.

Indexed as

Gene AmplificationDNA DamageDNA, NeoplasmHumansNeoplasmsNucleic Acid HybridizationDNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID16751803
OpenAlexW1977977741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.