Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16751782›Full record

Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2006

A prospective randomized trial of itraconazole vs fluconazole for the prevention of fungal infections in patients with acute leukemia and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

I Oren, J M Rowe, H Sprecher, A Tamir, N Benyamini, L Akria, A Gorelik, N Dally, T Zuckerman, N Haddad and 2 more

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guidelines for preventing infectious complications among hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients: a global perspective.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2009
    Guideline
  7. Guideline
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

I OrenInfectious Diseases Unit, Rambam Medical Center, Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel. i_oren@rambam.health.gov.il
J M Rowe
H Sprecher
A Tamir
N Benyamini
L Akria
A Gorelik
N Dally
T Zuckerman
N Haddad
R Fineman
E J Dann
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluconazole antifungal prophylaxis is standard care in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients, but this drug lacks anti-Aspergillus activity, the primary cause of invasive fungal infection (IFI) in many transplantation centers. We performed a randomized trial to compare itraconazole vs fluconazole, for prevention of IFIs in patients with acute leukemia (AL) and HSCT recipients. One hundred and ninety-five patients were randomly assigned to either fluconazole or itraconazole antifungal prophylaxis, after stratification into high-risk and low-risk groups. Antifungal prophylaxis was started at the beginning of chemotherapy and continued until resolution of neutropenia, or until amphotericin B treatment was started. IFI occurred in 11 (11%) of itraconazole, and in 12 (12%) fluconazole recipients. Invasive candidiasis (IC) developed in two (2%) itraconazole and one (1%) fluconazole recipients, while invasive aspergillosis (IA) developed in nine (9%) itraconazole and 11(11%) fluconazole recipients. There was no difference in the incidence of total IFI, IC and IA between the two study arms. However, there was a nonsignificant trend towards reduced mortality among patients who developed IA while receiving itraconazole prophylaxis (3/9=33% vs 8/11=73%, P=0.095).

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedAntifungal AgentsAspergillosisDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFluconazoleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansItraconazoleLeukemiaMaleMiddle AgedAntifungal AgentsFluconazoleItraconazole

Identifiers

PMID16751782
OpenAlexW1996285099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.