Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16751780›Full record

ArticleLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2006

Application of array CGH on archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues including small numbers of microdissected cells.

Nicola A Johnson, Rifat A Hamoudi, Koichi Ichimura, Lu Liu, Danita M Pearson, V Peter Collins, Ming-Qing Du

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Patterns of Chromosomal Aberrations in Solid Tumors.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2015
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genomic differences in benign and malignant follicular thyroid tumours using 1-Mb array-comparative genomic hybridisation.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicola A JohnsonDivision of Molecular Histopathology, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Rifat A Hamoudi
Koichi Ichimura
Lu Liu
Danita M Pearson
V Peter Collins
Ming-Qing Du
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK A6618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Array-based comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) has diverse applications in cancer gene discovery and translational research. Currently, aCGH is performed primarily using high molecular weight DNA samples and its application to formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues remains to be established. To explore how aCGH can be reliably applied to archival FFPE tissues and whether it is possible to apply aCGH to small numbers of cells microdissected from FFPE tissue sections, we have systematically performed aCGH on 15 pairs of matched frozen and FFPE astrocytic tumour tissues using a well-established in-house human 1 Mb BAC/PAC genomic array. By spiking tumour DNA with normal DNA, we demonstrated that at least 70% of tumour DNA was required for reliable aCGH analysis. Using aCGH data from frozen tissue as a reference, it was found that only FFPE astrocytic tumour tissues that supported PCR amplification of >300 bp DNA fragment provided high quality, reproducible aCGH data. The presence of necrosis in a tissue specimen had an adverse effect on the quality of aCGH, while fixation in formalin for up to 96 h of fresh tissue did not appear to affect the quality of the result. As little as 10-20 ng DNA from frozen or FFPE tissues could be readily used for aCGH analysis following whole genome amplification (WGA). Furthermore, as few as 2000 microdissected cells from haematoxylin-stained slides of archival FFPE tissues could be successfully used for aCGH investigations when WGA was used. By careful assessment of DNA integrity and review of histology, to exclude necrosis and select specimens with a high proportion of tumour cells, it is feasible to preselect archival FFPE tissues adequate for aCGH analysis. With the help of microdissection and WGA, it is also possible to apply aCGH to histologically defined lesions, such as carcinoma in situ.

Indexed as

AstrocytomaBiological Specimen BanksBiomarkers, TumorDNA, NeoplasmFormaldehydeHumansMicrodissectionNecrosisOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisParaffin EmbeddingReproducibility of ResultsTime FactorsTissue PreservationBiomarkers, TumorDNA, NeoplasmFormaldehyde

Identifiers

PMID16751780
PMCPMC2815849
OpenAlexW2023767070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.