Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16751490›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2006

Differential inlA and inlB expression and interaction with human intestinal and liver cells by Listeria monocytogenes strains of different origins.

Hadewig Werbrouck, Koen Grijspeerdt, Nadine Botteldoorn, Els Van Pamel, Nancy Rijpens, Jo Van Damme, Mieke Uyttendaele, Lieve Herman, Els Van Coillie

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Comparative Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Characterisation ofHeliyon · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Probiotic Bacteria and their Supernatants Protect Enterocyte Cell Lines from EnteroinvasiveInternational journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hadewig WerbrouckInstitute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research, Unit Technology and Food-Product Quality and Food Safety, Brusselsesteenweg 370, 9090 Melle, Belgium. Hadewig.Werbrouck@ilvo.vlaanderen.be
Koen Grijspeerdt
Nadine Botteldoorn
Els Van Pamel
Nancy Rijpens
Jo Van Damme
Mieke Uyttendaele
Lieve Herman
Els Van Coillie
Flemish Community · BEGhent University · BERega Institute for Medical Research · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, a number of Listeria monocytogenes strains of different origins were evaluated for in vitro invasion capacity for various human cell types (monocytic THP-1, enterocytic Caco-2, and hepatocytic HepG2 cells) and for expression levels of specific virulence genes. For THP-1 cells, no differences between clinical and nonclinical L. monocytogenes strains in invasion capacity or in production of the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-8 (IL-8) were observed, whereas for the Caco-2 and HepG2 cells, significant differences in invasion capacity were noticed. On average, the clinical strains showed a significantly lower invasion capacity than the nonclinical L. monocytogenes strains. Furthermore, it was shown that the clinical strains induce lower IL-8 levels in HepG2 cells than do the nonclinical strains. This observation led us to study the mRNA expression levels of inlA, inlB, and ami, important virulence genes mediating adhesion and invasion of eukaryotic cells, by real-time reverse transcription-PCR for 27 clinical and 37 nonclinical L. monocytogenes strains. Significant differences in inlA and inlB expression were observed, with clinical strains showing a lower expression level than nonclinical strains. These observations were in accordance with in vitro invasion of Caco-2 and HepG2 cells, respectively. The results of this study indicate that differential expression levels of inlA and inlB possibly play a role in the virulence capacities of L. monocytogenes strains. The lower capacity of clinical strains to invade HepG2 cells and to induce IL-8 is possibly a mechanism of immune evasion used by specific L. monocytogenes strains.

Indexed as

Agglutination TestsBacterial ProteinsBase SequenceCell Line, TumorDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersHumansIntestinal MucosaListeria monocytogenesLiverMembrane ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataPolymerase Chain ReactionVirulenceBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersinlB protein, Listeria monocytogenesinternalin protein, BacteriaMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16751490
PMCPMC1489604
OpenAlexW2098486166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.