Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16751473›Full record

ArticleQuality & safety in health care2006

Getting women to hospital is not enough: a qualitative study of access to emergency obstetric care in Bangladesh.

E Pitchforth, E van Teijlingen, W Graham, M Dixon-Woods, M Chowdhury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality & safety in health care, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

E PitchforthSocial Science Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 6TP, UK. elp17@le.ac.uk
E van Teijlingen
W Graham
M Dixon-Woods
M Chowdhury

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore what happened to poor women in Bangladesh once they reached a hospital providing comprehensive emergency obstetric care (EmOC) and to identify support mechanisms.

designMixed methods qualitative study.

settingLarge government medical college hospital in Bangladesh. SAMPLE: Providers and users of EmOC.

methodsEthnographic observation in obstetrics unit including interviews with staff and women using the unit and their carers.

resultsWomen had to mobilise significant financial and social resources to fund out of pocket expenses. Poorer women faced greater challenges in receiving treatment as relatives were less able to raise the necessary cash. The official financial support mechanism was bureaucratic and largely unsuitable in emergency situations. Doctors operated a less formal "poor fund" system to help the poorest women. There was no formal assessment of poverty; rather, doctors made "adjudications" of women's need for support based on severity of condition and presence of friends and relatives. Limited resources led to a "wait and see" policy that meant women's condition could deteriorate before help was provided.

conclusionsGreater consideration must be given to what happens at health facilities to ensure that (1) using EmOC does not further impoverish families; and (2) the ability to pay does not influence treatment. Developing alternative finance mechanisms to reduce the burden of out of pocket expenses is crucial but challenging. Increased investment in EmOC must be accompanied by an increased focus on equity.

Indexed as

PovertyAcademic Medical CentersAdultBangladeshEmergenciesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHospitals, PublicHumansMaternal Health ServicesObstetrics and Gynecology Department, HospitalPatient Acceptance of Health CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'PregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID16751473
PMCPMC2464855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.