Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16751278›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2006

The critical mutagenic translesion DNA polymerase Rev1 is highly expressed during G(2)/M phase rather than S phase.

Lauren S Waters, Graham C Walker

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Protein-Protein Interactions in Translesion Synthesis.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Beyond the Lesion: Back to High Fidelity DNA Synthesis.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Dynamics of DNA replication in a eukaryotic cell.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren S WatersDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Graham C Walker
Duke Medical Center · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Rev1 protein lies at the root of mutagenesis in eukaryotes. Together with DNA polymerase zeta (Rev3/7), Rev1 function is required for the active introduction of the majority of mutations into the genomes of eukaryotes from yeast to humans. Rev1 and polymerase zeta are error-prone translesion DNA polymerases, but Rev1's DNA polymerase catalytic activity is not essential for mutagenesis. Rather, Rev1 is thought to contribute to mutagenesis principally by engaging in crucial protein-protein interactions that regulate the access of translesion DNA polymerases to the primer terminus. This inference is based on the requirement of the N-terminal BRCT (BRCA1 C-terminal) domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rev1 for mutagenesis and the interaction of the C-terminal region of mammalian Rev1 with several other translesion DNA polymerases. Here, we report that S. cerevisiae Rev1 is subject to pronounced cell cycle control in which the levels of Rev1 protein are approximately 50-fold higher in G(2) and throughout mitosis than during G(1) and much of S phase. Differential survival of a rev1Delta strain after UV irradiation at various points in the cell cycle indicates that this unanticipated regulation is physiologically relevant. This unexpected finding has important implications for the regulation of mutagenesis and challenges current models of error-prone lesion bypass as a process involving polymerase switching that operates mainly during S phase to rescue stalled replication forks.

Indexed as

Cell DivisionG2 PhaseS PhaseAnimalsDNA DamageGene Expression Regulation, EnzymologicGene Expression Regulation, FungalMutationNucleotidyltransferasesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsY-Family DNA PolymerasesNucleotidyltransferasesREV1 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsY-Family DNA Polymerases

Identifiers

PMID16751278
PMCPMC1482550
OpenAlexW2131778464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.