Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16751249›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2006

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor channel electrostatics determined by diffusion-enhanced luminescence energy transfer.

Robert H Meltzer, Monica M Lurtz, Theodore G Wensel, Steen E Pedersen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. FRET in Membrane Biophysics: An Overview.Frontiers in physiology · 2011
    Article
  6. Structural answers and persistent questions about how nicotinic receptors work.Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library · 2008
    Review
  7. A paramagnetic molecular voltmeter.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2008
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert H MeltzerDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Monica M Lurtz
Theodore G Wensel
Steen E Pedersen
Baylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

Molecular Physiology of the Cardiovascular SystemT32HL007676 · NHLBI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI HAMILTON, SUSAN L · 1989 to 2020
$7.9M
Trasnducin Interactions with Photoreceptor MembranesR01EY007981 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI WENSEL, THEODORE G · 1989 to 2016
$6.1M
LIGAND BINDING SITES OF THE ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTORR01NS035212 · NINDS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI PEDERSEN, STEEN E · 1996 to 2002
$998k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY007981NEI NIH HHS R01-EY07981NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007676NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL07676NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM088280NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS35212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The electrostatic potentials within the pore of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) were determined using lanthanide-based diffusion-enhanced fluorescence energy transfer experiments. Freely diffusing Tb3+ -chelates of varying charge constituted a set of energy transfer donors to the acceptor, crystal violet, a noncompetitive antagonist of the nAChR. Energy transfer from a neutral Tb3+ -chelate to nAChR-bound crystal violet was reduced 95% relative to the energy transfer to free crystal violet. This result indicated that crystal violet was strongly shielded from solvent when bound to the nAChR. Comparison of energy transfer from positively and negatively charged chelates indicate negative electrostatic potentials of -25 mV in the channel, measured in low ionic strength, and -10 mV measured in physiological ionic strength. Debye-Hückel analyses of potentials determined at various ionic strengths were consistent with 1-2 negative charges within 8 A of the crystal violet binding site. To complement the energy transfer experiments, the influence of pH and ionic strength on the binding of [3H]phencyclidine were determined. The ionic strength dependence of binding affinity was consistent with -3.3 charges within 8 A of the binding site, according to Debye-Hückel analysis. The pH dependence of binding had an apparent pKa of 7.2, a value indicative of a potential near -170 mV if the titratable residues are constituted of aspartates and glutamates. It is concluded that long-range potentials are small and likely contribute little to selectivity or conductance whereas close interactions are more likely to contribute to electrostatic stabilization of ions and binding of noncompetitive antagonists within the channel.

Indexed as

Ion Channel GatingMembrane PotentialsModels, ChemicalModels, MolecularBinding SitesCell MembraneComputer SimulationDiffusionFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferLuminescent MeasurementsPorosityProtein BindingReceptors, NicotinicStatic ElectricityReceptors, Nicotinic

Identifiers

PMID16751249
PMCPMC1518635
OpenAlexW2071511254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.