ArticleBiophysical journal2006
Computed pore potentials of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cholinergic Modulation of Proteinoid Microsphere Networks as Prebiotic Depression Models.ACS physical chemistry Au · 2026Article
- Rings of charge within the extracellular vestibule influence ion permeation of the 5-HT3A receptor.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2011Article
- Structural answers and persistent questions about how nicotinic receptors work.Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library · 2008Review
- A paramagnetic molecular voltmeter.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2008Article
- Recalled to life: resurrection of diffusion-enhanced fluorescence energy transfer.Biophysical journal · 2006Article
- Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor channel electrostatics determined by diffusion-enhanced luminescence energy transfer.Biophysical journal · 2006Article
- Electrostatic steering at acetylcholine binding sites.Biophysical journal · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electrostatic surface potentials in the vestibule of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) were computed from structural models using the University of Houston Brownian Dynamics program to determine their effect on ion conduction and ionic selectivity. To further determine whether computed potentials accurately reflect the electrostatic environment of the channel, the potentials were used to predict the rate constants for diffusion-enhanced fluorescence energy transfer; the calculated energy transfer rates are directly comparable with those determined experimentally (see companion article by Meltzer et al. in this issue). To include any effects on the local potentials by the bound acceptor fluorophore crystal violet, its binding site was first localized within the pore by fluorescence energy transfer measurements from dansyl-C6-choline bound to the agonist sites and also by simulations of binding using Autodock. To compare the computed potentials with those determined experimentally, we used the predicted energy transfer rates from Tb3+ chelates of varying charge to calculate an expected potential using the Boltzmann relationship. This expected potential (from -20 to -40 mV) overestimates the values determined experimentally (from -10 to -25 mV) by two- to fourfold at similar conditions of ionic strength. Although the results indicate a basic discrepancy between experimental and computed surface potentials, both methods demonstrate that the vestibular potential has a relatively small effect on conduction and selectivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.