Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16749645›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Medical Association2006

Using qualitative and quantitative strategies to evaluate knowledge and perceptions about sickle cell disease and sickle cell trait.

Marsha J Treadwell, Lakenya McClough, Elliott Vichinsky

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Medical Association, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marsha J TreadwellChildren's Hospital and Research Center at Oakland, 747 52nd St., Oakland, CA, USA. mtreadwell@mail.cho.org
Lakenya McClough
Elliott Vichinsky
Oakland University · US

Funding

PHS HHS 4H46MC00250-03-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate knowledge, perceptions and the effectiveness of different sources of information about sickle cell trait (SCT) and sickle cell disease (SCD); to determine individual knowledge of SCT status.

methods28 individuals participated in three focus groups (healthcare providers, people affected by SCD or SCT, and community members). Surveyors interviewed 282 respondents within their neighborhoods.

resultsCommon themes across the focus groups included the limited general awareness of SCD and SCT, the emphasis on the benign nature of SCT rather than on future implications, and the need for public health education campaigns about SCD and SCT involving media strategies. The majority of community survey respondents (n = 243, 86.2%) had correct general knowledge about the genetic basis and severity of SCD, but only 16% (n = 45) knew their own trait status. When respondents had received information about SCD from friends and acquaintances, they were three times more likely to know their SCT status, compared with respondents who had not received information from a personal source (p < 0.01).

conclusionsDespite a screening history in the 1970s fraught with controversy, sickle cell disease management and detection can be a model for the empowerment of communities in making informed decisions about theirs and their families' futures, given the burgeoning of genetic information.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultAnemia, Sickle CellBlack or African AmericanCaliforniaCatchment Area, HealthClinical CompetenceData CollectionFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PromotionHospitals, CommunityHumansInterviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID16749645
PMCPMC2569269
OpenAlexW185680520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.