Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16741706›Full record

ArticleChromosoma2006

Cell-type specific proximity of centromeric domains of one homologue each of chromosomes 2 and 11 in nuclei of cerebellar Purkinje neurons.

Kunjumon I Vadakkan, Baoxiang Li, Umberto De Boni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosoma, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kunjumon I VadakkanDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, M5S 1A8 Toronto, ON, Canada.
Baoxiang Li
Umberto De Boni
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Purkinje neurons of the mouse cerebellum, the centromeres of several chromosomes are placed in close proximity to form a distinct pattern of clusters and exhibit reproducible spatial redistributions during development. In granule neurons, an adjacent cell type in the cerebellum, the pattern, size, and number of centromeric aggregations are different from those of Purkinje neurons. The present work was undertaken to test the hypothesis that the same chromosomes form part of one aggregate in a cell-type-specific manner. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with chromosome-specific paracentromeric probes was used to identify centromeric regions of individual chromosomes in cerebellar Purkinje and granule neurons of the adult mouse. When pairs of centromeric probes were used in two-color FISH, one homologue each of chromosomes 2 and 11 were routinely found close to each other in Purkinje neurons but not in granule neurons. This finding of specific proximity was limited to the pair 2 and 11, out of the ten chromosome pairs that were randomly selected and studied. Our results indicate that, in adult Purkinje neurons, a cell-type-specific spatial proximity is present between centromeric domains of one homologue each of chromosomes 2 and 11.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell NucleusCentromereDNA ProbesIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMicePurkinje CellsDNA Probes

Identifiers

PMID16741706
OpenAlexW2000752620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.