ArticleChromosoma2006
Cell-type specific proximity of centromeric domains of one homologue each of chromosomes 2 and 11 in nuclei of cerebellar Purkinje neurons.
Article in Chromosoma, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trend towards varying combinatorial centromere association in morphologically identical clusters in Purkinje neurons.Cell & chromosome · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Purkinje neurons of the mouse cerebellum, the centromeres of several chromosomes are placed in close proximity to form a distinct pattern of clusters and exhibit reproducible spatial redistributions during development. In granule neurons, an adjacent cell type in the cerebellum, the pattern, size, and number of centromeric aggregations are different from those of Purkinje neurons. The present work was undertaken to test the hypothesis that the same chromosomes form part of one aggregate in a cell-type-specific manner. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with chromosome-specific paracentromeric probes was used to identify centromeric regions of individual chromosomes in cerebellar Purkinje and granule neurons of the adult mouse. When pairs of centromeric probes were used in two-color FISH, one homologue each of chromosomes 2 and 11 were routinely found close to each other in Purkinje neurons but not in granule neurons. This finding of specific proximity was limited to the pair 2 and 11, out of the ten chromosome pairs that were randomly selected and studied. Our results indicate that, in adult Purkinje neurons, a cell-type-specific spatial proximity is present between centromeric domains of one homologue each of chromosomes 2 and 11.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.