Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16740926›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2006

Mutations and rearrangements in the genome of Sulfolobus solfataricus P2.

Peter Redder, Roger A Garrett

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Archaeal tyrosine recombinases.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Acid Experimental Evolution of the HaloarchaeonFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  8. Nonmutational mechanism of inheritance in the ArchaeonProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mechanisms of gene flow in archaea.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter RedderDanish Archaea Centre, Institute for Molecular Biology and Physiology, Copenhagen University, Sølvgade 83H, DK-1307 Copenhagen K, Denmark . predder@pasteur.fr
Roger A Garrett
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genome of Sulfolobus solfataricus P2 carries a larger number of transposable elements than any other sequenced genome from an archaeon or bacterium and, as a consequence, may be particularly susceptible to rearrangement and change. In order to gain more insight into the natures and frequencies of different types of mutation and possible rearrangements that can occur in the genome, the pyrEF locus was examined for mutations that were isolated after selection with 5-fluoroorotic acid. About two-thirds of the 130 mutations resulted from insertions of mobile elements, including insertion sequence (IS) elements and a single nonautonomous mobile element, SM2. For each of these, the element was identified and shown to be present at its original genomic position, consistent with a progressive increase in the copy numbers of the mobile elements. In addition, several base pair substitutions, as well as small deletions, insertions, and a duplication, were observed, and about one-fifth of the mutations occurred elsewhere in the genome, possibly in an orotate transporter gene. One mutant exhibited a 5-kb genomic rearrangement at the pyrEF locus involving a two-step IS element-dependent reaction, and its boundaries were defined using a specially developed "in vitro library" strategy. Moreover, while searching for the donor mobile elements, evidence was found for two major changes that had occurred in the genome of strain P2, one constituting a single deletion of about 4% of the total genome (124 kb), while the other involved the inversion of a 25-kb region. Both were bordered by IS elements and were inferred to have arisen through recombination events. The results underline the caution required in working experimentally with an organism such as S. solfataricus with a continually changing genome.

Indexed as

Gene RearrangementGenome, ArchaealMutationArchaeal ProteinsDNA Mutational AnalysisDNA Transposable ElementsDrug Resistance, MicrobialOrotic AcidSulfolobus solfataricus5-fluoroorotic acidArchaeal ProteinsDNA Transposable ElementsOrotic AcidpyrF protein, Archaeal

Identifiers

PMID16740926
PMCPMC1482960
OpenAlexW2136263210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.