Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16738570›Full record

ArticleMolecular systems biology2006

Proteome analysis of yeast response to various nutrient limitations.

Annemieke Kolkman, Pascale Daran-Lapujade, Asier Fullaondo, Maurien M A Olsthoorn, Jack T Pronk, Monique Slijper, Albert J R Heck

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular systems biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comprehensive Response ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A tractable physical model for the yeast polarity predicts epistasis and fitness.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Are Marine Heatwaves Responsible for Mortalities of FarmedAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Energy metabolism controls phenotypes by protein efficiency and allocation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Annemieke KolkmanDepartment of Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry, Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research and Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Pascale Daran-Lapujade
Asier Fullaondo
Maurien M A Olsthoorn
Jack T Pronk
Monique Slijper
Albert J R Heck
Utrecht University · NLDelft University of Technology · NLDSM (Netherlands) · NLUniversity of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared the response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to carbon (glucose) and nitrogen (ammonia) limitation in chemostat cultivation at the proteome level. Protein levels were differentially quantified using unlabeled and 15N metabolically labeled yeast cultures. A total of 928 proteins covering a wide range of isoelectric points, molecular weights and subcellular localizations were identified. Stringent statistical analysis identified 51 proteins upregulated in response to glucose limitation and 51 upregulated in response to ammonia limitation. Under glucose limitation, typical glucose-repressed genes encoding proteins involved in alternative carbon source utilization, fatty acids beta-oxidation and oxidative phosphorylation displayed an increased protein level. Proteins upregulated in response to nitrogen limitation were mostly involved in scavenging of alternative nitrogen sources and protein degradation. Comparison of transcript and protein levels clearly showed that upregulation in response to glucose limitation was mainly transcriptionally controlled, whereas upregulation in response to nitrogen limitation was essentially controlled at the post-transcriptional level by increased translational efficiency and/or decreased protein degradation. These observations underline the need for multilevel analysis in yeast systems biology.

Indexed as

AmmoniaCulture MediaGlucoseProteomicsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsUp-RegulationYeastsAmmoniaCulture MediaGlucoseSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16738570
PMCPMC1681501
OpenAlexW2141018553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.