Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16738371›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2006

Conflicts of interest: how money clouds objectivity.

Richard Smith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Disclosing conflicts of interest in patient decision aids.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The drugs industry: a bad product well marketed.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2012
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Clinical studies in medical journals.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2007
    Article
  14. Conflicts of interest that are bigger than money but never disclosed.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2006
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Richard SmithUnitedHealth Europe. richardsmith@yahoo.co.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Conflict of InterestPeriodicals as TopicAdvertisingHumansPublishing

Identifiers

PMID16738371
PMCPMC1472724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.