Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16737852›Full record

ReviewTrends in immunology2006

DNA repair in antibody somatic hypermutation.

Paolo Casali, Zsuzsanna Pal, Zhenming Xu, Hong Zan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in immunology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Epigenetics of the antibody and autoantibody response.Current opinion in immunology · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. MicroRNAs in lupus.Autoimmunity · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Epigenetics of the antibody response.Trends in immunology · 2013
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paolo CasaliCenter for Immunology, School of Medicine and School of Biological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-4120, USA. pcasali@uci.edu
Zsuzsanna Pal
Zhenming Xu
Hong Zan
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Immunoglobulin class switch DNA recombinationR01AI045011 · NIAID · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI CASALI, PAOLO · 2000 to 2011
$3.8M
Immunology Research Training ProgramT32AI060573 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI PEARLMAN, ERIC · 2005 to 2020
$1.9M
SOMATIC HYPERMUTATION IN HUMAN B CELLSR01AR040908 · NIAMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI CASALI, PAOLO · 1992 to 2005
$1.8M
Immunoglobulin class switch DNA recombinationR56AI045011 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI CASALI, PAOLO · 2012 to 2012
$523k
NIAID NIH HHS AI 45011NIAID NIH HHS AI 60573NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI045011NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI045011NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI060573NIAMS NIH HHS AR 40908NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR040908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatic hypermutation (SHM) underlies the generation of a diverse repertoire of high-affinity antibodies. It is effected by a two-step process: (i) DNA lesions initiated by activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), and (ii) lesion repair by the combined intervention of DNA replication and repair factors that include mismatch repair (MMR) proteins and translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) polymerases. AID and TLS polymerases that are crucial to SHM, namely polymerase (pol) theta, pol zeta and pol eta, are induced in B cells by the stimuli that are required to trigger this process: B-cell receptor crosslinking and CD40 engagement by CD154. These polymerases, together with MMR proteins and other DNA replication and repair factors, could assemble to form a multimolecular complex ("mutasome") at the site of DNA lesions. Molecular interactions in the mutasome would result in a "polymerase switch", that is, the substitution of the high-fidelity replicative pol delta and pol epsilon with the TLS pol theta, pol eta, Rev1, pol zeta and, perhaps, pol iota, which are error-prone and crucially insert mismatches or mutations while repairing DNA lesions. Here, we place these concepts in the context of the existing in vivo and in vitro findings, and discuss an integrated mechanistic model of SHM.

Indexed as

DNA RepairAnimalsDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA ReplicationEscherichia coliSomatic Hypermutation, ImmunoglobulinDNA-Directed DNA Polymerase

Identifiers

PMID16737852
PMCPMC4623574
OpenAlexW2166774900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.