ReviewPediatric surgery international2006
Necrotising enterocolitis and localised intestinal perforation: different diseases or ends of a spectrum of pathology.
Review in Pediatric surgery international, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Necrotizing enterocolitis following spontaneous intestinal perforation in very low birth weight neonates.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025Article
- Neonatal Gastrointestinal Perforations: the 10-Year Experience of a Reference Hospital.The Indian journal of surgery · 2017Article
- Systemic inflammation associated with severe intestinal injury in extremely low gestational age newborns.Fetal and pediatric pathology · 2013Article
- Endotoxin induced chorioamnionitis prevents intestinal development during gestation in fetal sheep.PloS one · 2009Article
- Recurrent neonatal gastro-intestinal problems after spontaneous intestinal perforation.Pediatric surgery international · 2007Article
- Gastrointestinal perforation in neonates: aetiology and risk factors.Journal of neonatal surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16736213What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.